![]() ![]() ![]() %REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN%values and running a scan I came up with a clear distinction between files. But adding adding two columns to it with %REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN%and Because when I got to know about ReplayGain, I also started using Mp3tag for tagging Īnd so, I used Winamp for checking. So many years I've used it and never spotted that. Some players show this info so you may indeed have the tool. I hope this comes out as a coherently painted big picture and not ramblings of a mind driven by an audiophilia nervosa So if those two were done by somebody for purpose, how many FLAC files are there that are ReplayGained up beyond clipping point? Also 1%, resulting in a number not worth of an effort when taking into consideration amount of work I do in a 6 months time? Or maybe 10%, resulting in a number needed of extra attention even when considering my average monthly workload? I could clearly see frequency cutoff lines, signs of compression and / or transcodes in those files: something I would probably not detect audibly and something that none of other dowloaders seemed to notice Since I started to use spectrograms for checking audio quality, I run every piece of audio through themĪnd so for almost 200 various albums and singles, 2 of the albums happened to be fake FLACs. The first one I can counter-battle, but I need proper simple toolsĭo you have any indications that you do not get the results that you expect? L] Every time I hear few characteristic distortions in film music track I wonder, if it is the fault of bad file or is it just another salvo in the loudness war. Assuming of course that FLAC itself, or any other format including MP3, was not created from audio already damaged by way to much ReplayGain applied to it, by some inexperienced or purposely wrongly operating person K] Because of how FLACs look in audio editor and because of loudness war, I have no way of defending against possible clipping other that applying a minus value to ReplayGain. ![]() J] I do not know why, but every FLAC I process has most of it waveform presented in such a form that if it was an MP3 I would think of it: "aha, I forgot to lower ReplayGain and this right here was most likely pumped up by it" And since around 2010 probably the last bastion of normally processed audio is starting to being massacred: score music I] There is a war launched upon listeners: loudness war. H] If I could wipe out all tags from FLACs, I would gain access to purified audio and have it in my WAVes G] It is very likely that I will have no knowledge if my future audio converters take the ReplayGain metadata out of the picture before encoding FLAC to WAV I can lower it by using MP3Gain Ĭ] FLACs can have ReplayGain attached to them- as a metadata onlyĭ] I have no tool such as MP3Gain that would process FLACs in the same wayį] I have no knowledge if my audio converters take the ReplayGain metadata out of the picture before encoding FLAC to WAV, or o they retain it I can lower it by using MP3Gainī] MP3s can have ReplayGain attached to them permanently. Let me bring this to few simple factsĪ] MP3s can have ReplayGain attached to them- as a metadata. Of course this is real issue and a very vital to me. Is there an actual use case or is this purely academic? So if I would to see it in "Extended Tags.", then I would know there is something more? I would I not see this "-keep-foreign-metadata" if I would check "Extended Tags." and couldn't even possibly wipe it with >Remove field except "fields to leave: "<< ? This article would suggest that such an indicator would be the "-keep-foreign-metadata". This article do not even mention of ID3 and APE usage- so how can I know that a FLAC file does not have some more metadata attached to it? Are there at all some other tags stored not in that APE and / or ID3? Then it means my Mp3tag will take care of only ID3 and APE tag fields? But what about hypothetical others? I just want to be sure: will this option wipe all of the tag fields that are not listed inside it?Īnd does "Extended Tags." icon form the Toolbar always show all there is?īut could it be possible for a file in a format supported by Mp3tag to have some special / hidden / not-so-typical tag value attached to it, that Mp3tag could not wipe or show this tag field? Maybe in some older version of ID3?Īnd what about values stored not in ID3 or APE? If I have in ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |